Do you still use PDF/X in XMF?

Started by Lyzan, February 09, 2015, 01:42:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 3 4 5
User actions

Tracy

#60
February 25, 2015, 05:35:43 PM
I got it to do the Normalize postscript thing!
It was a pdf setting.



dang it I can't get the screen shot in.
Post tomorrow.
sheesh

Tracy

#61
February 25, 2015, 05:38:11 PM
When I selected the PDFX1A
It went through Normalize and Postscript etc..

Joe

#62
February 25, 2015, 06:04:38 PM
There you go Tracy. You get two Gold Stars for the day.

[attachimg=1]
Mac OS Sonoma 14.2.1 (c) | (retired)

The seven ages of man: spills, drills, thrills, bills, ills, pills and wills.

mattbeals

#63
February 26, 2015, 01:06:37 AM
Quote from: Lyzan on February 21, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
Quote from: mattbeals on February 18, 2015, 12:05:47 PMThe reason to use PDF/X vs. high quality print (which really are essentially the same thing) is that with PDF/X you have a few rigid rules that must be adhered to in order to be called "PDF/X". It's an easy way to filter out the chaff. If it's not PDF/X-"x" compliant, then something is very wrong. It's a simple and efficient way of pre-filtering everything.


Like the retrograde specifying an output intent? :-)


Yup. Got to know what they want.
Matt Beals

Everything I say is my own personal opinion and has nothing to do with my employer or their views.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 3 4 5
User actions