http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?email&NewsID=20878
CS4 already? Damnit Adobe! You dont even have CS3 right yet. :angry:
It's already in beta
I wonder WTF we are supposed to do when Windows users send us CS4 files and we have no CS4 for Macs?
Kinda dumb on Adobes part IMO, better to wait until they have both platforms ready. And yes I know PDF's are an option but still...
Quote from: ninjaPB_43 on April 03, 2008, 08:16:55 AMCS4 already? Damnit Adobe! You dont even have CS3 right yet. :angry:
Yeah, it would be nice if they would get the current version working correctly before they unleash the latest bag of crap on us. Of course maybe their bank account is getting low?
4 gig of RAM to run 64 bit PS.... Jesus Christ!!!! I can see the problems now, 5 gig PS file with 100 layers, 150 paths, "it open's fine on my machine..."
happy happy joy joy
:azn:
So let me get this straight... 32 AND 64 bit versions for PC to accomodate older OS and Vista. AND... 32 bit for Mac released in conjuction with windows, and later 64 bit Mac... Did I read that correctly?
I read elsewhere that CS4 will be released in 2010. That means we all still have some time to make money with those expensive CS3 licenses.
Quote from: Laurens on April 03, 2008, 01:25:37 PMI read elsewhere that CS4 will be released in 2010. That means we all still have some time to make money with those expensive CS3 licenses.
Geez and I just renewed my ASN contract too.
Don't for get that 64 bit Vista is a separate operating system from Vista 32 bit and is more expensive. Secondly, it was hardly the fault of Adobes fault that Apple pulled support for 64 bit Carbon. However it is Adobes fault that didn't start porting sooner. It's not as straightforward as it seems
Quote from: jezza on April 03, 2008, 07:53:59 PMDon't for get that 64 bit Vista is a separate operating system from Vista 32 bit and is more expensive. Secondly, it was hardly the fault of Adobes fault that Apple pulled support for 64 bit Carbon. However it is Adobes fault that didn't start porting sooner. It's not as straightforward as it seems
Thanks Jezza, that actually clarifies a lot. I did not know there were two versions of Vista.
Cheers DCS. There's a much more informative article here
http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/photoshop_lr_64.html#c1179745
Quote from: jezza on April 03, 2008, 08:19:35 PMCheers DCS. There's a much more informative article here
http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/04/photoshop_lr_64.html#c1179745
Now it all makes sense... Thanks again Jezza.
Quote from: DigitalCrapShoveler on April 03, 2008, 07:56:44 PMQuote from: jezza on April 03, 2008, 07:53:59 PMDon't for get that 64 bit Vista is a separate operating system from Vista 32 bit and is more expensive. Secondly, it was hardly the fault of Adobes fault that Apple pulled support for 64 bit Carbon. However it is Adobes fault that didn't start porting sooner. It's not as straightforward as it seems
Thanks Jezza, that actually clarifies a lot. I did not know there were two versions of Vista.
We bought Vista Ultimate at work and it comes with both the 32 bit and the 64 bit version depending on your hardware. Both suck!
as least it ain't Quark...
thank god for small favors.
Quote from: david on April 04, 2008, 07:07:59 AMas least it ain't Quark...
thank god for small favors.
Quark 8? Full live transparency support? PDF 1.7 compliance? Look...a pink elephant just flew by my window.
watch out just to make sure you don't step into sumpin...
(http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2006/11/barbie_poop.jpg)
You know, rabbits eat their own feces too. Only after one pass through, though.
hey look, Dave posted a picture of Gnub all dolled up just like barbie.. we knew you had it in you to be "normal" gnub... hahahhahahahah :evil: