Line screen vs. Stochastic (Staccato)

Started by mlarsen, April 07, 2017, 12:04:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Farabomb

The main ones we do the metallics for always have a damn near 400% black so we found it's not needed. We rarely have issues with trapping, in face I can't remember the last time the pressman blamed some trapping issue on me.
Speed doesn't kill, rapidly becoming stationary is the problem

I'd rather have stories told than be telling stories of what I could have done.

Quote from: Ear on April 06, 2016, 11:54:16 AM
Quote from: Farabomb on April 06, 2016, 11:39:41 AMIt's more like grip, grip, grip, noise, then spin and 2 feet in and feel shame.
I once knew a plus-sized girl and this pretty much describes teh secks. :rotf:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
         â€”Benjamin Franklin

My other job

born2print

How will I laugh tomorrow...
when I can't even smile today?

SpicyVindaloo

We run 226 line euclidean for both web and sheetfed. Not sure who came up with that number but it works well for us.

Years back we ran a job at 600 line screen for fun and it came out better than when we ran it with 10 micron Staccato. We had some major curves set up and we had time to experiment.