B4Print.com

Workflows => Agfa Systems => Topic started by: DCurry on August 31, 2010, 11:59:51 AM

Title: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DCurry on August 31, 2010, 11:59:51 AM
Anyone know if there is any harm in running an AzuraTS plate thru the processor (really, just a gummer) twice? Sometimes, when my gum is getting old and/or I haven't run a plate in a day or so, I get some gum gunk (spots, streaks) on the plate. It washes off on press with no problem, but I like to give the pressroom clean plates if possible. So, I just run it thru the gummer again.

I would never do this if this wasn't a "chem-free" plate, but I figure all it is doing is adding more gum and brushing away the gunk.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Farabomb on August 31, 2010, 12:41:14 PM
If there is a scrubber roller I'd be slightly concerned but if it truly is just a gum unit it should be fine. If you have one check the plate before and after with a plate densitometer and see if it changes the dot.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: seratne on August 31, 2010, 12:48:28 PM
I've done it many times with the original Azura plates, and haven't seen anything bad creep up.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DCurry on August 31, 2010, 01:18:19 PM
There is a scrubber, but the way the plate works is that the laser fuses the coating to the aluminum in the image area, and the scrubber removes everything that is unfused (non-image area). Haven't seen any problems yet.

Seratne - welcome aboard!
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Santa on September 01, 2010, 05:39:33 AM
Have done it many times for the exact same thing (clean plates) for the last five years....no issues.....your not developing your just re-gumming.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on September 01, 2010, 02:51:41 PM
Not one single problem. Nope. I do it too.

If they haven't already, Agfa should be coming out to replace a part on your C series processor. I guess one somewhere overheated, and now they're paranoid. Never had any issues with mine. Ever!
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: G_Town on September 01, 2010, 03:01:01 PM
Quote from: digital@sig-1.com on September 01, 2010, 02:51:41 PMNot one single problem. Nope. I do it too.

If they haven't already, Agfa should be coming out to replace a part on your C series processor. I guess one somewhere overheated, and now they're paranoid. Never had any issues with mine. Ever!

Ever??
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on September 01, 2010, 03:04:17 PM
in almost 2 years, not one issue.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Santa on September 02, 2010, 06:28:18 AM
I'll back that up....5 years.......no issues.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: beermonster on February 09, 2011, 09:37:18 AM
while in litho prepress and while i used the azura and TS i took the lazy way and didnt run through the processor again - it washes off easily on press as you said and well - do the press boys want me to run the komori's as well :ninja2:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 09, 2011, 09:54:02 AM
Quote from: G_Town on September 01, 2010, 03:01:01 PM
Quote from: digital@sig-1.com on September 01, 2010, 02:51:41 PMNot one single problem. Nope. I do it too.

If they haven't already, Agfa should be coming out to replace a part on your C series processor. I guess one somewhere overheated, and now they're paranoid. Never had any issues with mine. Ever!

Ever??

Sounds like never ever! Wish everything was like that.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Farabomb on February 09, 2011, 10:13:03 AM
Ever is a hell of a long time.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on February 10, 2011, 09:15:00 AM
Just had our first TS issue... An exact reprint job from November 2009 came out lighter on press this go around. I had our guy go through our Screen Plate Rite and it all checked out within spec. I cleaned the processor to a pristine state, and changed chemistry to a new lot. Brought the plate back to a linear state and measure all values in 5% increments. It reads perfect.

Turned out we have three possible issues... when the Agfa guys came out to test the new American made plates, they might have changed laser intensity, which affects the baking of the plate. Still, the plate reads perfect when brought to a linear state, so it really can't be that.

We also changed press wash and ink manufacturers. It has to be an issue on press, so the TS still rocks!
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Farabomb on February 09, 2011, 10:13:03 AMEver is a hell of a long time.

I guess not that long. He just had a problem.  :laugh:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on February 10, 2011, 09:57:57 AM
Quote from: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 09:52:37 AM
Quote from: Farabomb on February 09, 2011, 10:13:03 AMEver is a hell of a long time.

I guess not that long. He just had a problem.  :laugh:
It turned out to be a non-problem... Press issue.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 10:21:27 AM
Ya, just blame it on the pressman.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Joe on February 10, 2011, 10:21:48 AM
Quote from: digital@sig-1.com on February 10, 2011, 09:15:00 AMJust had our first TS issue... An exact reprint job from November 2009 came out lighter on press this go around. I had our guy go through our Screen Plate Rite and it all checked out within spec. I cleaned the processor to a pristine state, and changed chemistry to a new lot. Brought the plate back to a linear state and measure all values in 5% increments. It reads perfect.

Turned out we have three possible issues... when the Agfa guys came out to test the new American made plates, they might have changed laser intensity, which affects the baking of the plate. Still, the plate reads perfect when brought to a linear state, so it really can't be that.

We also changed press wash and ink manufacturers. It has to be an issue on press, so the TS still rocks!

Really? A press issue? That is hard to believe. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: David on February 10, 2011, 11:33:54 AM
I detect a note of sarcasm, there Joe. hmmm
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: youston on February 10, 2011, 11:35:48 AM
Quote from: david on February 10, 2011, 11:33:54 AMI detect a note of sarcasm, there Joe. hmmm

So do I, but it was very subtle. Masterfully done, Joe.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Joe on February 10, 2011, 11:49:08 AM
Me? Never!
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 12:05:35 PM
Fooled me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me...You can't get fooled again.   :laugh:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on February 10, 2011, 12:25:02 PM
Around here, I only blame it on the pressman when I know I'm right, and can prove it. :-)

Bush "Fool Me Once..." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A#)
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 12:33:11 PM
Quote from: Lumpy on May 24, 2010, 01:39:59 PMSo, I'm siiting at home right now and I flip on CNN.
A press conference is going on with a Coast Guard dude and a bunch of empty suits!
WTF! They got a split screen going on the screen with these f@#ks standing around talkin' and a live shot of the pipe sh#@ting oil out!  If this were going on during Bush time what do ya think would happen?
I'm just sayin'.

Quote from: tapdn on May 24, 2010, 03:03:26 PMHe would be sitting in a room full of 5 year old reading a book upside down?

My favorite post here. Ever.  :cheesy:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: David on February 10, 2011, 01:17:03 PM
taking a step back into the wayback machine there Gnub?

 :kiss:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 01:18:47 PM
What, nine months ago?
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: Farabomb on February 10, 2011, 01:31:08 PM
Nine months can be life changing.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 01:33:17 PM
Indeed. Enough to turn your life upside down. Forever.
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: David on February 10, 2011, 01:48:52 PM
or right side up, depending
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: gnubler on February 10, 2011, 02:36:31 PM
No, I meant what I said. The "up" side is turned "down". Forever.  :huh:
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: pspdfppdfxhd on May 17, 2011, 07:40:25 AM
We just got the plate shipment for the ctp coming in this week.... AGFA Azura TS... sounds like good plates no?
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: beermonster on May 17, 2011, 08:01:08 AM
they are excellent plates psdfdxppsdscrtdfpdpf mate

many posts on their goodability and rliablenessness
Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: pspdfppdfxhd on May 17, 2011, 08:30:52 AM
Ah God bless em. (the powers that be here).



Title: Re: AzuraTS plate thru processor twice - danger?
Post by: DigiCorn on May 17, 2011, 08:40:59 AM
I spent yesterday afternoon after work filling in at my old shop for my old coworker who was out on vacation. They still run the old violet Agfa plates with the purple crap emulsion. When I was running plates, compared to the .12 mil Azura TS we run, their .04 mil were like tinfoil. I couldn't picture how the SM52 doesn't just rip them to shreds like our Komori would.