Skip to main content

Recent Topics

xx

xx

clip
Pagination Mode
by nordeuk@hotmail.com
September 25, 2017, 07:46:44 AM

xx
Licensing update issue
by Ear
September 21, 2017, 06:28:50 PM

xx
PPML
by Joe
September 21, 2017, 12:45:20 PM

xx
OSX version
by Joe
September 20, 2017, 03:07:28 PM

xx
press calibration
by andyfest
September 19, 2017, 08:12:27 AM

xx
Command Workstation VDP
by DigiCorn
September 18, 2017, 11:24:13 AM

xx
Thumbnail view lost
by Lyzan
September 18, 2017, 08:13:00 AM


Topic: Simple Imposition dude (Read 1679 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Joe
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
  • Master of Nothing
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #15
I've tried explaining to customers why it is cheaper to run their magazine on our presses if they either print 56 or 64 pages which are both 2 press runs. (32 + 24 = 56) or (32 + 32 = 64) but they will repeatedly try to sneak in a 60 pager that is 3 press runs (24 + 24 + 12). All are divisible by 4. As a courtesy we always try to explain that they will save about $3K - $5K if they either add or subtract 4 pages. They are always upset until you explain the dollar figures to them. Then next issue same thing. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

Prepress: One who does precision guess work based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.

  • Ear
  • [*][*][*]
  • Fiya wata
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #16
Right! FFS! We try to tell them that too. A half web costs as much, if not more than a full web... same amount of plates, make ready, etc... the only difference is the size of the paper roll, which is a marginal savings. Not to mention, it takes longer to print the dinky because the press crew has to shut off half of the ink and there are inherent problems with running skinny rolls of paper. Bindery hates half webs too.
Quote: Skryber  "FreeHand sucks ferocious porcupine balls!"

Quote from: born2print "Well now doesn't that suck petrified possum penis."

  • Tracy
  • [*][*]
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #17
I remember dinky from my Newspaper days, been awhile tho

  • Joe
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
  • Master of Nothing
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #18
Right! FFS! We try to tell them that too. A half web costs as much, if not more than a full web... same amount of plates, make ready, etc... the only difference is the size of the paper roll, which is a marginal savings. Not to mention, it takes longer to print the dinky because the press crew has to shut off half of the ink and there are inherent problems with running skinny rolls of paper. Bindery hates half webs too.

We do 1/2, 2/3, and 3/4 dinkys. Which is always a treat when imposing. :strangle:
Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

Prepress: One who does precision guess work based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.

Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #19
Hi everby, Im noob using this navigator's plugin.

I wonder if is possible impose 2  files, head to head or foot to foot.




You may get the result you want by rotating the files 90 degrees prior to bringing into the imposition program.
Not the best way, but completely doable.