Skip to main content

Recent Topics

xx

xx
Oris RFP questions...
by swampymarsh
April 29, 2017, 07:18:31 AM

xx
Split already imposed book to single pages
by AaronH
April 28, 2017, 07:54:07 PM

xx
Enfocus announces PitStop 2017
by Ear
April 28, 2017, 05:47:56 PM

xx
New Illustrator Update
by Tracy
April 27, 2017, 04:32:44 PM

xx
Infected PDFs
by Possum
April 27, 2017, 03:34:35 PM

question
Preps 8 spot plate color mark problem.
by DigiCorn
April 27, 2017, 12:26:10 PM

xx
Esko Imaging Engine - anyone have it?
by G_Town
April 26, 2017, 01:27:35 PM

xx
ReadyNAS as a Server
by Tracy
April 25, 2017, 03:27:00 PM

xx
Line screen vs. Stochastic (Staccato)
by SpicyVindaloo
April 24, 2017, 01:59:20 PM

xx

xx
Preps 5.3 for sale
by Tracy
April 24, 2017, 12:24:19 PM


Topic: Simple Imposition dude (Read 1230 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Joe
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
  • Master of Nothing
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #15
I've tried explaining to customers why it is cheaper to run their magazine on our presses if they either print 56 or 64 pages which are both 2 press runs. (32 + 24 = 56) or (32 + 32 = 64) but they will repeatedly try to sneak in a 60 pager that is 3 press runs (24 + 24 + 12). All are divisible by 4. As a courtesy we always try to explain that they will save about $3K - $5K if they either add or subtract 4 pages. They are always upset until you explain the dollar figures to them. Then next issue same thing. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

I'm not negative...I'm just always positive that something bad is going to happen!

  • Ear
  • [*][*][*]
  • Pro Bono Prepressico
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #16
Right! FFS! We try to tell them that too. A half web costs as much, if not more than a full web... same amount of plates, make ready, etc... the only difference is the size of the paper roll, which is a marginal savings. Not to mention, it takes longer to print the dinky because the press crew has to shut off half of the ink and there are inherent problems with running skinny rolls of paper. Bindery hates half webs too.
Quote: Skryber  "FreeHand sucks ferocious porcupine balls!"

Quote from: born2print "Well now doesn't that suck petrified possum penis."

  • Tracy
  • [*][*]
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #17
I remember dinky from my Newspaper days, been awhile tho

  • Joe
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
  • Master of Nothing
Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #18
Right! FFS! We try to tell them that too. A half web costs as much, if not more than a full web... same amount of plates, make ready, etc... the only difference is the size of the paper roll, which is a marginal savings. Not to mention, it takes longer to print the dinky because the press crew has to shut off half of the ink and there are inherent problems with running skinny rolls of paper. Bindery hates half webs too.

We do 1/2, 2/3, and 3/4 dinkys. Which is always a treat when imposing. :strangle:
Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

I'm not negative...I'm just always positive that something bad is going to happen!

Re: Simple Imposition dude
Reply #19
Hi everby, Im noob using this navigator's plugin.

I wonder if is possible impose 2  files, head to head or foot to foot.




You may get the result you want by rotating the files 90 degrees prior to bringing into the imposition program.
Not the best way, but completely doable.