Author Topic: "bad in-house gets public thrashing"  (Read 2131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline delooch

  • Ninja Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4703
  • Gender: Male
  • Are you not entertained?
"bad in-house gets public thrashing"
« on: July 28, 2008, 11:17:25 AM »
and i thought my shop needed help... this guy got caught spending 5 months cruising 84,034 websites.  he could have saved all that trouble by just hanging out at - at least it would have appeared work-related..

"We the unwilling, trained by the unskilled, do the impossible for the ungrateful, ten minutes too late."

Offline Slappy

  • Ninja Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4134
  • Gender: Male
  • Come On. Fhqwhgads.
Re: "bad in-house gets public thrashing"
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2008, 11:49:09 AM »
If all of their work was being out-sourced, whose fault is it for not doing some kind of audit and reducing employees then? I don't see a problem - you take away all of the work, and still want to pay people to show up and not have any actual jobs to do, then they're lucky they didn't start printing money in-house instead!  :laugh:
A little diddie ‘bout black 'n cyan...two reflective colors doin’ the best they can.