p01 Kansas City Southern
Skip to main content

Recent Topics

xx
Preflight for black text
by Joe
Today at 10:34:31 AM

clip

xx
Acrobat excessive RAM usage
by Joe
October 12, 2018, 06:20:51 PM

xx

xx
Mac Email Client
by Joe
October 11, 2018, 02:01:39 PM

clip
Text moves when box is duped
by DCurry
October 10, 2018, 01:30:33 PM

xx
Font Management
by Joe
October 09, 2018, 05:30:47 PM

xx
Mojave (and Acrobat DC)
by Joe
October 09, 2018, 04:51:24 PM

xx
Export PDF reverse pages?
by wonderings
October 09, 2018, 01:08:09 PM

xx
Printing direct vs. spooling
by mattbeals
October 08, 2018, 02:01:48 PM

xx
He-e-elp! backsave please...
by DigiCorn
October 05, 2018, 01:57:26 PM

clip
Layers Versioning
by Slappy
October 04, 2018, 09:02:44 PM

xx
What is best Augmented Reality app / software
by Santa
October 04, 2018, 11:50:40 AM

xx
Xmpie or Fusion Pro
by pspdfppdfxhd
October 04, 2018, 08:35:43 AM

xx
New Windows 10 PC
by Slappy
October 03, 2018, 11:58:32 PM

Topic: Printing direct vs. spooling (Read 311 times) previous topic - next topic

Printing direct vs. spooling

We've got a great Konica color machine, with one glaring omission: no command workstation. Too much $$$$$.

Rather than suffer the ridiculous rip times for pdfs going through the "other program" obviously creating huge spool files, is there a way to print direct as a "rip on the fly" kind of like streaming like netflix.

Sorry if I asked this question before, it just keeps coming up again and again and again.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #1
And I am not talking about 4 color jobs either.... simple variable type jobs but up to about 10,000 pages.

We have been forced to split the pdf's up into say, 2000 pages to make it manageable.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #2
I think your printer would have to have a huge amount of RAM if OS X would even allow it. Spooling to disk is the way it feeds only so much data at a time that the printer can handle.
Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

Prepress: One who does precision guess work based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #3
I think your printer would have to have a huge amount of RAM if OS X would even allow it. Spooling to disk is the way it feeds only so much data at a time that the printer can handle.

Oyyyy, over my head I am afraid.

Talking about printing direct to the printer from the pc that controls it, ie. open pdf in Acrobat and print.
This bypasses the controller program which has to rip and spool the whole file. I think.
Couldn't it just stream and print the file as it processes? Like Netflix? Sorry, that's the only comparison I can make.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #4
I can't even imagine running a digital press without command workstation or something like it.
How do you do colour calibration, alignment adjustments and all that?

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #5
Oh it has those features.

Doesn't have imposition or the ability to accept anything other than pdf. No ppml or the other variable formats that only rip the 4 color once instead of every page.


Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #6
I know our Fiery running CWS on the Versant digital press has 4 independent processors and when you're queuing a large job, you can see all 4 chewing the file and it does so pretty quickly (that said, when it's not randomly replacing images).
"I'm not addicted to cocaine. I just like the way it smells."
– Richard Pryor

“Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.”
― Ernest Hemingway

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #7
Oyyyy, over my head I am afraid.

Talking about printing direct to the printer from the pc that controls it, ie. open pdf in Acrobat and print.
This bypasses the controller program which has to rip and spool the whole file. I think.
Couldn't it just stream and print the file as it processes? Like Netflix? Sorry, that's the only comparison I can make.

Oh on a PC...I think you can do it on a PC but when you print it, it takes control of the PC and will not let you do anything else on it until the whole job is done. Here is the setting:

Mac OS 10.12 Sierra | Prinergy 7.5 | Adobe Creative Cloud 2017 | Two Luscher XPose 160 CTP units

Prepress: One who does precision guess work based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #8
Well it takes control of the printer when it's spooling for hours anyways.

Thanks, we'll try this.

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #9
I remember with our older digital devices that there was a print direct que. Had to setup another print que that when used it just sent the file and printed automatically. I currently use that for an old machine that we use for office printing now.  Not sure if this will do exactly what you are looking for, think not as the machine would still need to RIP, but it does just start printing when ready.

 

Re: Printing direct vs. spooling

Reply #10
Spooling in 1993 was superior then, it's still superior now.
Matt Beals

Everything I say is my own personal opinion and has nothing to do with my employer or their views.